Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 11:51

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What is your language's pangram?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s up in the sky for June 2025? Arietid meteor shower, strawberry moon and much more - WTOP
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Orton advances in the King of the Ring after the Paul Heyman Guys screw LA Knight - Cageside Seats
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Florida higher ed board stuns UF, blocks Santa Ono from becoming president - Gainesville Sun
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Scientists Uncover Giant Spiders That Once Terrorized Jurassic Earth - The Daily Galaxy
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Court documents reveal OpenAI is coming for your iPhone - 9to5Mac
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
How do you envision the role of AI in software development evolving in the future?